by Westley Price » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:07 pm
You know, I am often against some of the subspecies being elevated to new species, but I am all for new genera being created for unique snakes.
I understand that most of the changes are warranted due to mitochondrial DNA results. A few (like Pachydactylus mariquensis complex) were split due to scalation, but I think DNA is the dominant source.
My main issue with this is where do you draw the line? I am sure if one compares Berg Adders from Mpumalanga to Berg Adders from the Western Cape, there is a difference in DNA due to the time the populations have been isolated, but surely we can't go that far?
I hope WW, armata or one of the other academics can pop in and give a better answer.
"I am dying by inches from not having anybody to talk to about insects." - Charles Darwin