froot wrote:WW I have a question about venom dessication. You say that it needs to be dried as fast as possible, and I would assume that one would need an agressive water scavenger that does not fume or give off odours which could taint the venom. What springs to mind for chemicals that would rapidly remove any water from the air in a dessicatoin setup, in order of aggression would be 98-100% H2SO4 and unslaked lime (CaO). Another one that I have and may work well but is a very nasty and expensive chemical - P2O5 (phosphorus pentoxide). I would imagine these chamicals would be placed in an open petri dish type container next to the open tubes with the venom samples. This is obviously placed in an airtight container forming the dessicator and carefully placed in a freezer. Would this setup suffice?
Any of those chemicals would be useful and do the trick. In the field, we normally use silica gel (non-hazardous), and simply pop the venom tubes into the gel in a closed,airtight jar. One of the key factors is not too have too much venom in a tube, if you have an Eppendorff with 1 ml of venom in it, it will take a long time to dry, whereas 0.1 ml won't take long at all. Another method we have used is a simple plastic vacuum chamber with silica gel, and one of those rubber cork-vacuum pump kits for preserving wine in a half-empty bottle (I hardly ever seem to end up with half-empty bottles, so I use the corks and pump for drying venom
). Again the venom just goes into the gel in open Eppendorff or Sarstedt tubes, and stays there unti dry.
When you say that 'various proteolytic enzymes' in venom destroy each other, howcome they do not destroy each other in the venom gland? Could it not be their exposure to gasses in the air that reacts with them to break them down? (oxidise?) If this could be the case would it not be an idea to replace the air in the dessicator setup with an inert gas, perhaps nitrogen?
Excellent Q, and something that is currently being researched in several labs. One of the lines of evidence suggests that snake venoms also contain various inhibitors of the venom toxins, and the nasties only start their work once they become dissociated from their inhibitors when the venom is ejected/injected. That may explain, among other things, how some highly myotoxic PLA2s can cause generalised skeletal muscle damage but no local damage to muscle tissue around the bite site: the inhibitors chaperone them for a while until the toxins break free, by which time they are away from the bite area, and in the general circulation - and then you get generalised rabdomyolysis, Coca-Cola coloured urine and potentially kidney failure, as for instance in Crotalus durissus.
Cheers,
WW